Hi, 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >> <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> napisał: >>> 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx>: >> [..] >>>> There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other >>>> modules that add support for the protocol. >>> >>> I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference. >>> >>> Who can mod_spdy if I make the spec file for this? >> >> I wanted to write "Who can adopt mod_spdy" :) >> >> I created a feature page >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F18SPDY >> >> If someone accidentally did not know what SPDY is - there is a link to >> interesting video from GoogleTechTalks on this page. >> >> I also created an initial version of spec file for mod_spdy that can >> be found at this repo https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/mod_spdy >> > > That mod_ssl_with_npn.so hack looks pretty dodgy to me. Does that even > work? Have you tested this together with the regular mod_ssl that comes > with the httpd package? I've got some problems with getting it to work. > I cannot see how both modules can coexist. I think that it is not possible. > > Regards, > Dennis > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
