On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:16 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Ummmmmm ... okay. > > > > Any particular reason? > > Kickstarts are not very user-friendly nor convenient (unless you have > several machines to install with identical installs, which is what they were > invented for). > > > Any other plans to make the current situation better? > > Even QA-wise, I don't think making such a feature kickstart-only would > improve the situation at all, it'd reduce the testing it gets by a lot. It's worth bearing in mind there's a giant anaconda UI rewrite still pending, which entirely redesigns the storage configuration GUI. One of the other major changes is that it makes all installations kickstart-driven. The GUI will just produce a kickstart file, which anaconda will then process to perform the actual install. It's not a direct response to any of the points raised so far, but it's worth bearing in mind while you're having this argument that F18 anaconda is going to look drastically different from F17 anaconda. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel