> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Richard Shaw > > <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Darn... I was hoping that wouldn't bite me :) I'm assuming I can > >> ignore the error though? Or does it need to be fixed? > > > > Fix. :( > > Which means I really need to bump the release in rawhide, right? > There's nothing I can do to the f17 package that would cause it to be > < the f18 package, unless killing the update is sufficient? Hey, have a look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_tests/Upgradepath#Fixing_the_failures which links here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches This way you _can_ update just a single branch. Use '.fc17.1' suffix. Of course you must know whether you want to do this (whether the fix is really not needed in rawhide). And since pushing to rawhide is easy... your choice. PS: This test is called 'upgradepath', not 'depcheck'. See the headline in the results document. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
