On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 03:00 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Robinson wrote: > > Exactly! Ultimately what we need is FESCo to document what are the > > requirements of being promoted to a primary architecture and then it's > > the ARM SIGs job of ensuring they adhere to the requirements, provide > > viable workable alternatives that are acceptable to FESCo, or provide > > proof that the requirement will be met within an agreed time frame. > > ARM should most definitely NOT be approved as a primary architecture before > all the requirements are actually met! > > We have seen what happened when the EU took Greece's word on the promise > that they'd eventually meet the Maastricht criteria. Let's not do the same > mistake in Fedora! You heard it here first, folks: the next economic crisis will be caused by ARM as a primary arch. :rolleyes: -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
