On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Peter Jones wrote: >> In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues >> I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There >> are some places where I think the current proposal fails to deal with some >> necessary aspects of becoming a primary architecture, and some places >> where I don't think the approach is quite right. > > How about: "support for the main hardware features on commonly-used hardware > is Free Software, and included in the upstream software (kernel, X.Org X11, > CUPS, SANE etc.) where appropriate"? Right now, this is clearly NOT the case > for OpenGL on ARM, so by promoting ARM, we'd promote proprietary (graphics) > driver use. I think that's going slightly too far. We certainly wouldn't suggest to our users that they install a proprietary driver on any of the Fedora project websites or wikis. It's probably more accurate to classify your concern as ARM graphics being unsupported or at best crippled. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
