On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 18:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Looking at last gcc build times (not unusual, though I really remember > > arm taking much longer than that, e.g. 4.7.0-0.11.fc17 took almost 17 > > hours on both arm architectures), from > > http://*koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/gcc/4.7.0/0.20.fc17/data/logs/*/state.log : > > i686 4h18m > > x86_64 1h25m > > ppc 4h12m > > ppc64 4h16m > > s390 6h27m > > s390x 6h04m > > armv5tel 26h20m > > armv7hl 24h17m > > > > So even speeding this up twice means it is still 2x slower than the > > slowest other secondary architecture. > > Ouch!!! > > That shows that ARM should be the LAST architecture we consider for primary > status rather than the first. (That said, I don't think it makes sense to > make PPC primary again or to make S/390 primary. They don't have anywhere > near the market share. But IMHO ARM doesn't have the market share either.) Can you define what market you refer to ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
