Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/20/2012 12:56 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> On 03/20/2012 09:50 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>> I don't know about the details there but that does not sound like
>>> unfixable to be.
>>> I'd even say that fixing that is a prerequisite to allow secondary
>>> archs that run on "slow" hardware to become primary.
>>
>> Please, please, no.  Cross compilation for Fedora cannot and will not
>> ever get a secondary arch to primary.  We're talking man-decades of
>> engineering time to solve all the problems.  Decades.
>
> Yup. I vote we shelve this part of the discussion in the interest of
> ever turning our proposal into something that will be accepted.

OK fair enough (even though I still think that it is the only sane way
to solve the build speed issue).
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux