W dniu 19 marca 2012 15:27 użytkownik Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> napisał: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/19/2012 10:16 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> W dniu 19 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >> <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx> napisał: >>> 2012/3/19 Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 03/17/2012 11:25 PM, Dave Quigley wrote: >>>>>> On 3/17/2012 7:17 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 03/17/2012 >>>>>> 05:38 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 17.3.2012 10:18, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Here is the current httpd man page. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/httpd_selinux.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > OK, in the end it IS a wiki ... >>>>>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout?action=diff&rev1=46&rev2=47 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > Suggestions for further edits are welcome. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Matěj >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> I would also suggest they use setroubleshoot. >>>>>> >>>>>> Suggesting setroubleshoot is fine but you need to also tell >>>>>> them how to set it up when they are running without X. One >>>>>> guy told me that setroubleshoot is fine and all but all his >>>>>> machines are headless so he doesn't have X and the nice >>>>>> little applet to notify him. I had to correct him and send >>>>>> him a reference to your page on how to set up >>>>>> setroubleshoot on headless machines so that the messages >>>>>> are sent to another box or to an email account. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave >> >> >> Which brings up an interesting idea, I have been having, is there >> a better way of getting the setroubleshoot data from one machine >> to another. Originally setroubleshoot was designed to be able to >> push analysys upstream but we never turned it on. Now that we >> have simplified the XML output, we could look at allowing it to >> some how centralize its analysys, using a protocol more robust then >> email If anyone has a good idea of how or where we should do this, >> I am all ears. >>>> >>>> Is it possible to split setroubleshoot into two components: - >>>> gui - daemon that creates logs ? >> >>> I really did not use setroubleshoot for a few years - because I >>> don't use X, so please forgive my ignorance if it's already >>> splited :) >> > setroubleshoot-server is the server componant. (dbus service) > setroubleshoot is the client componant. > > We could put the info into systemd-journal. It would be great if there was a possibility to send logs to other machines. Lennart, what do you think about it? Centralized log system is nice feature. >>>> >>>> Logs can be stored in systemd-journal format. systemd-journal >>>> should have ability to forward logs on other machines. >>>> >> >>>> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Best regards, Michal >>> >>> http://eventhorizon.pl/ >> >> >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk9nQmIACgkQrlYvE4MpobPMkACeImKNxcR3/AUqrJlwcnJ+sUsM > tacAniIGW9vXHWEDlaTqOPDw1xsDArhO > =Q+fI > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
