-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve G wrote: > The patch is trivial. I just wanted to know which way this should be fixed. Do > you want to leave glibc in this form or do you want me to file this in bugzilla > with m4's patch? glibc-2.3.3-53 (when released) will have the __P macro in the form m4 and other packages expects it. glibc itself will simply not use the macro anymore, at all, so it doesn't matter the optimizations we introduced through __P are not present. No need to file any bugs related to this. - -- â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBR6m22ijCOnn/RHQRAge8AJ47VzRIY++2k9LXDzWuka2IQWdwaQCfWzdj 2Z2USg50OdXY9GQeFZ6bAhA= =JvUf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
