Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/03/12 13:16, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Not to mention bug reporter not necessarily understanding the full
> consequences of a change - change that might look trivial but has
> world-breaking effects.
> 
> And FWIW, four week vacations are common in this part of the world...
> 
>     - Panu -
Absolutely. I think, this can not (easily) be automated.

I would prefer to have a manual selection of packagers
getting access, something like proven packagers.
(I know, this leads to bureaucracy and should be avoided)

Accidental mistakes can happen, at least proven packagers
know, how to revert this.

What about: getting more proven packagers?
Make them more prominent, i.e. making it easier to contact
them?
-- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
               <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux