On 03/01/2012 04:52 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
related to the issues discussed in this thread?
Hard to tell, without (preferably debug-level) logs. I have the same
problem you're describing occur in 0.9.2-1 (see bug #797524), but I've
not seen it with 0.9.3-0.2.git20120215.
0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either
success or failure) before saying the machine is connected. Thus if
IPv4 completes first, NM will say it's connected, and continue IPv6 in
the background. And vice versa.
But that does not yet address the dhcpv6 ip6tables ACCEPT rule that is
missing right?
There will be a dhcpv6 service entry for firewalld soon and later on
also for system-config-firewall.
Where how and when it will and could be enabled will be evaluated.
Paul
Thomas
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
