Re: libglfw orphaned, but it has dependancies still in fedora ? (fwd)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Peter Robinson wrote:

I was asked to look into this. libglfw is retired, but has dependancies
that need it. It was added to Fedora on Nov 16, and retured by notting
on July 25th, but it does not say why.

Can this package be revived? If needed, I'll take it on. This is
apparently the next generation glut, and used by people, and other
fedora packages as the logs below here show,

Yes it can be revived. The process is basically the same as a new
package review process except you reference the original review as
well.

Well, I understand it can be revived. I guess what I was really asking
was why was it orphaned? There might have been a legal reason or
something I'm not aware of.

I located the original review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972

Currently filed bugs against it:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674380
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754658

Paul (Johnson): Did you want to revive/maintain the package? Or should I
or Chrisopher Olah take it over?

Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux