Re: Looking for a package maintainer for flam3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 23:10:12 -0600,
  Ian Weller <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:33:20PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I took a quick look at it and it looks like it's just one for one
> > substitutions to use accessor functions instead of references to
> > provate data.
> > 
> > I have rawhode and f17 builds going right now.
> > 
> > I don't know how to test this, so it would probably be good for you
> > to test them out to make sure the fix (or something else) didn't
> > break anything.
> 
> Yeah, this is enough for me to keep it going. I'll send the patch
> upstream. Thanks! :)

I enjoy helping out fellow Fedora contributors.

Thanks for whatever Fedora work you do, that I couldn't easily do, with
the time I saved you.

I also like keeping these from escalating to Tom Lane, who I'd rather
see working on Postgres.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux