On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 21:28 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > This is to reboot the discussion about: why not also building the > libgbm part of Mesa in Fedora? > > Having it would make it easier to test Wayland and friends. Any > reasons on why not having it so far? Thorsten Leemhuis has very graciously stepped up to bring F17's Mesa and Wayland packaging up to date: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2244/mesa-8.0.1-2.fc17,wayland-0.85.0-1.fc17 It was great, he showed up with patches and I said "yeah those look fine" and then he committed them. I wish I got more drive-by contributions like that. - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
