Simon Erat wrote: > What has been prepared so far: > * http://sf.net/p/seasc (source code, in sub projects) > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795696 (review request) > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/rpm.sc.template.spec > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/changelog > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/sc-0.2.0.tar.gz (its a bash script, > nothing to compile) > * http://sea.hostingsociety.com/sc-0.2.0-2.fc16.noarch.rpm First observations: * Name is too short. A package with such a long history as "ed" can get away with a 2-letter name, but yours not really. It's just asking for conflicts… * The specfile name is not valid (should be %{name}.spec, not rpm.%{name}.template.spec). Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
