Am 20.02.2012 21:19, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> /usr/share in our general understanding not to be used for >> package-private things. > Who is "we"? This is in direct conflict with the FHS: > > "Any program or package which contains or requires data that doesn't > need to be modified should store that data in /usr/share (or > /usr/local/share, if installed locally). It is recommended that a > subdirectory be used in /usr/share for this purpose." > > >> There is no reason to have >> /usr/share/<pkgdir>/ and /usr/lib/<pkgdir>, even LSB specifies that >> only a _single_ dir should be used, hence the one in lib not in share. > Chapter and verse, please? AFAICS all LSB says is > http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/LSB_4.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/execenvfhs.html http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLIBLIBRARIESFORPROGRAMMINGANDPA /usr/lib : Libraries for programming _and_ packages Applications may use a single subdirectory under /usr/lib. If an application uses a subdirectory, all architecture-dependent data exclusively used by the application must be placed within that subdirectory. For example, the perl5 subdirectory for Perl 5 modules and libraries. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
