Re: Some fedora projects are still not using transifex (properly)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kévin Raymond wrote:
> I've managed to get the whole list of transifex.net projects who appears
> dead, here they are:
...
> [D] iwhd

I deliberately switched iwhd from transifex to http://translationproject.org
because the latter provides anonymous rsync access, while transifex requires
that one register and use an account merely to download translations:

    http://trac.transifex.org/ticket/740

If you're used to version-controlling your project's .po files, you may
not see the point, since then, downloading .po files is usually done only
by the maintainer.  However, if you do not VC the .po files, but rather
pull them via a bootstrap script, as done by upstream coreutils, grep,
diffutils, parted, etc., then everyone who builds from a just-cloned
directory must download the .po files.  I don't want to impose the
burden of registering on those folks.

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.iwhd.devel/1047
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux