Le Lun 20 février 2012 21:07, Kay Sievers a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 20:42, Nicolas Mailhot > <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Le Lun 20 février 2012 18:50, Kay Sievers a écrit : >>> On Feb 20, 2012 6:25 PM, "Toshio Kuratomi" <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Udev rules and systemd units belong to the installed daemon. This daemon >>> can only exist exactly one single time, and never be installed by multilib >>> packages, hence they do not ever belong into libdir. >> >> Actually, Udev rules and systemd units belong to the package that installed >> them. That's why hiding them in a private lib dir is wrong >> >> When amavisd instaciates clamav using the generic unit shipped with clamav >> but >> using an amavisd-specific conf file the clamav systemd unid is shared with >> amavisd >> >> That's why share is the natural place to share this arch-independant >> configuration and putting it in /usr/lib is grandfathering an exception that >> only existed because /share didn't exist > > I couldn't disagree more. > > /usr/share in our general understanding not to be used for > package-private things. But those files are not package-private! Even ignoring the example I just gave, systemd units *will* be installed by different packages that *will* need to be at least aware of the other units to handle ordering properly. Those files are anything but package-private -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
