On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 06:52, Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 22:03, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > is having the modules executable an actual problem? > > AFAICT it's the same problem or non-problem as with any file out there > if a file that is not meant to be executable has executable bits set. > But I believe it's pretty much cosmetic in this case. http://www.yak.net/carmen/unix_horror.html Go to the above URL and search for the submission from mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx . -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
