Am 08.02.2012 15:11, schrieb Chris Adams: >>> criteria! This affects both the DVD upgrades and preupgrade, which >>> are the 2 upgrade methods Fedora claims to support. >> >> I did not see a release yet, where did you find it? > > He said "release criteria". Included in that is the Feature Freeze > (which was yesterday for F17), which includes: > > Once the Feature Freeze milestone is reached, all new features for the > release should be: > - substantially complete and in a testable state > > If the anaconda support for UsrMove is not merged (and maybe not even > written?), then why was an untestable and incomplete feature merged? because Fedora decided in the last releases to propose features and include them with the HOPE they MAY BE finished until release, hope is really not enough for a solid development, it could be if releases would happen in they way "it will be released if it is fnished" but NOT "it may be good enough and the release date is near" this is no "straight-forward" this is simply the best way to destroy the distribution if this happens the same way with the next releases because over the long the userbase get lost and contributors will also get lost if pemanently decisions are enforced which means a hughe work for all maintainers proposed by a handful of people Fedora 11-14 was a rock solid distribution and is slightly going down more and more because hughe changes happens only for the "we changed" instead of slow a little bit down and make existing features/packages/infrastructure rock solid i will not understand any developer who thinks he must permanently implement new things and make hughe changes affecting all users and contributors because fixing bugs and optimize existing features is not funny enough!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
