On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 13:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Again, citing FHS: > "Distributions may install software in /opt, but must not > modify or delete software installed by the local system > administrator without the assent of the local system > administrator." > > > How can this be interpreted as "non-OS vendor supplied"? > > This is one of many places in which FHS is vague but that's the common > interpretation all distributions rely on Um. Really? Wasn't there a distro - I'm thinking SUSE? - that installed KDE in /opt for a long time? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
