Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 13:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>         
>         
>         Again, citing FHS:
>         "Distributions may install software in /opt, but must not
>         modify or delete software installed by the local system
>         administrator without the assent of the local system
>         administrator."
>         
>         
>         How can this be interpreted as "non-OS vendor supplied"?
> 
> This is one of many places in which FHS is vague but that's the common
> interpretation all distributions rely on

Um. Really? Wasn't there a distro - I'm thinking SUSE? - that installed
KDE in /opt for a long time?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux