Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 00:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> That's really GNOME's fault. :-( Canonical explicitly designed 
> libappindicator (which is the library applications are expected to use, it 
> uses libindicator behind the scenes; there's also libindicate which is for 
> communication apps to notify new messages and such, confusing, isn't it?) to 
> be interoperable with KDE's status notifier spec, and thus applications 
> supporting libappindicator will also integrate better into the KDE Plasma 
> workspaces than applications still stuck on the legacy XEmbed-based system 
> tray protocol and/or using a GNOME-only gnome-shell extension. But GNOME is 
> giving the finger to cross-desktop protocols and refusing to implement them.
> 
> It's too bad that our maintainers for the affected packages are often one 
> and the same as the GNOME maintainers and thus Fedora is mostly siding with 
> GNOME on this and refusing to carry those patches, hurting all non-GNOME 
> desktops, not just Unity.

Kevin, I am not going to comment on the incendiary language here (I know
you are pretty tone-deaf in email). But to blame us for not embracing a
spec after our comments on it were completely ignored seems a little
unfair, to say the least.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux