On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jerry James wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> No, because xulrunner needs it to rebuild. Why is libvpx breaking >>> package builds? Almost nothing should depend on it. The plan is for the >>> libvpx update to go out at the same time as the xulrunner update. >> >> Sorry, got busy with Real Life and couldn't get back to this thread >> yesterday. In my case, it is because of this chain of dependencies: >> >> PyQt4-devel => >> PyQt4 (via libQtWebKit) => >> qtwebkit (via libQtLocation & libQtSensors) => >> qt-mobility (via libgstphotography) => >> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free => >> libvpx > > Which buildroot? rawhide? f16? (As far as I recall, rawhide, f16 should > have the new libvpx, gstreamer-plugins-bad-free tagged properly) Yes, the buildroots are both fine now. Thanks for fixing them. I was just responding to spot's apparent surprise that an updated libvpx in the buildroot should have broken package building for other people. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
