Once upon a time, Emanuel Rietveld <codehotter@xxxxxxxxx> said: > On 02/01/2012 01:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >To-be-installed files obviously have no on-disk fingerprints, so it > >wont work for initial installation. So yes, those "fake" compatibility > >provides are needed. Strictly speaking, compatibility provides would > >be needed for ALL the moved files, not just /bin, as it's technically > >perfectly legal for a package to depend on an arbitrary path in > >/lib[64], not just /[s]bin. > > > > - Panu - > > Would it be possible to leave out these provides and fix each individual > package to require in the new path instead? It isn't practical to "fix" every package that requires /bin/sh. There sure seems to be a lot of uncertainty for a "feature" that is supposedly ready to land. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
