On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 07:30 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 01/27/2012 09:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 16:36 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > >> On 01/27/2012 04:13 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > >>> Roland Grunberg wrote: > >>> > >>>> I noticed that libselinux was just updated to have ldconfig > >>>> in /usr/sbin/ as per : > >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove. > >>>> > >>>> It seems glibc hasn't yet been update though and I'm getting > >>>> the following when attempting a scratch build in rawhide. > >>> > >>> Righto, moved the offending libselinux-2.1.9-5.fc17 build to > >>> f17-usrmove tag instead. > >>> > >>> -- rex > >>> > >>> > >> Oops, I thought we could build packages now. I also built an > >> updated policycoreutils... > >> > >> When are we throwing the big switch in Rawhide? > > > > Well, if I were the Big Kahuna, I'd like at least a few successful > > tests of the migration, a test of a fresh install of F17 with the > > changed packages (we can build images to do this), and possibly a > > definite resolution to the reservations some still seem to have > > about the requirements for patched rpm and stuff. Dennis....? > > > Ok the problem with that is people like me run in rawhide all the time > to try to prevent other people seeing SELinux Hickups. So the sooner > I see major changes the better. Do we have a yum repository I could > point at to switch my machine to the new usrmove environment. There were instructions in the announcement thread on exactly how you can test the changes right now. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
