On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 04:16 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:05:37 Manuel Escudero wrote: > > > And also I've been told this desktop is available for > > > ArchLinux now as well... As for this facts I was wondering > > > how feasible is to port Unity to Fedora as well > > > > The last I heard from the Arch packaging efforts was that Unity won't > > be an > > officially supported package until it no longer depends on > > non-upstream patches > > to GTK+ and friends. > > > > The same seems to be true for OpenSuse: > > > Since we're replacing some of the core components of openSUSE (ex: > > > GTK+, > > > gnome-session) the priority is important. > > (pasted from your link) > > > > I don't think I'm going out on a limb if I say that this doesn't look > > like > > Unity will hit Fedora repos anytime soon. You may look at > > repos.fedorapeople.org, though. > > > > As far as I remember Adam Williamson once looked at the feasibility > > of > > packaging Unity for Fedora. Don't know what was the result, though. > > Maybe he > > can elaborate on that. > > I tried Unity 2D, the QML version - it's much more easier to package for > Fedora, I was nearly done but Unity then introduced a lot of new G* > dependencies and I didn't want to step into our desktop lands (but I > suppose the are not using these deps, so it shouldn't be a big problem). If it's not in Fedora, you can package it if you need it. You certainly don't need to ask the Desktop team anything (and a bunch of us have proven packager so we can help with updates, if GNOME does end up using those dependencies). > So I can try to give it another round. > > R. > > > Lars > > -- > > devel mailing list > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
