Re: F17 proposal - prerelease version name changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:01:07PM +0100, Swapnil Bhartiya wrote:

> I don't think Fedora is for 'consumers'. Due to the policy to not 
> include many non-free components and missing apps from main repos, I 
> don't consider it a consumer OS. I tried it myself and also tried to put 
> it on average user's PCs but it refuse to work as a consumer OS should 
> work. I still can't boot Fedora 16 on my PC.
> 
> Yes, it is a superbly great developer OS.

I don't completely agree with you (and who says you can't install
additional non-free components on top of an OS?), but an even bigger
problem would then be the enterprise/business preview naming (although
I *do* install/maintain Fedora as a desktop for business customers,
as RHEL c.s. just contains too old software for some desktop users).

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux