On 01/24/2012 07:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:23:14AM +0000, mike cloaked wrote:
>> Fedora would appear to be out of line in not taking on board the
>> potential user base for a rolling release version. For servers there
>> would be huge advantages in management of systems.
>
> I doubt your claims here.
>
> Fedora already has a perfectly good rolling release. It's called
> Rawhide, and I run it on my laptop. I'd be nuts to run it on a
> server.
>
exactly - rawhide is not a rolling release as everyone uses the phrase.
A rolling release typically has 3 repos - stable, testing and
development.
rawhide is really on the 'devel' part.
>
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
