Re: The question of rolling release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/01/12 12:22, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2012/1/24 Josh Boyer<jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>:
How is rawhide not a rolling release?  Or perhaps better asked, what
about rawhide makes it
unsuitable for use as a rolling Fedora release?

This has been discussed several times on this list: Technically,
rawhide is a rolling release, sure. But rawhide is not near as stable
as it needed to be to be seriously considered for productive use.
There is no testing repo acting as a filter for example.

- Thomas

Create a sig\wiki page see what support you can get.
Not a "me too" page.
But a who'll step up and do the work page.
What skills\experience do they bring to your sig.
Will it bring in extra heavy-lifters,
or further dilute the current pool.

If one or two leave, will there be egg.
--
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux