Re: new comps group proposal: Virtualization Host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 04:18:17PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:09:45PM +0100, Alan Pevec wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I'd like to add a new group in comps.xml to make it easier to install
> > minimal hypervisor based on Fedora.
> > It would include only basic virtualization software (libvirt and
> > qemu-kvm) and it would serve as a base to install virtualization
> > management stack on top of it.
> > Initial use-cases are:
> > - Fedora oVirt host where vdsm agent is installed on top of proposed
> > Virtualization Host group
> >   Also oVirt Node livecd kickstart would use that group instead of the
> > current list of packages:
> >   http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-node.git;a=blob;f=recipe/common-pkgs.ks;hb=HEAD
> > 
> > - Openstack nova nodes where various openstack-* packages are
> > installed, depending on the node configuration (compute, controller,
> > images or object store service)
> > 
> > Since comps groups can't be extended, flow is to choose Minimal on the
> > initial Anaconda screen, then Customize Now:
> > * http://apevec.fedorapeople.org/virtmin1.png
> > In the next step, under Base System category, new "Virtualization
> > Host" group is choosen.
> > * http://apevec.fedorapeople.org/virtmin2.png
> > 
> > This should produce a working hypervisor with networking where
> > additional packages can be installed using yum.
> > 
> > Questions for this list are:
> > - do you think there's value to have this "Virtualization Host" option
> > in the first Anaconda screen, among Graphical Desktop/Software
> > Development/Web Server and Minimal, to avoid the second step?
> >   This list of options is defined in anaconda and each option maps to
> > a list of actual comps groups
> > - any better suggestions for the name of the group, maybe
> > "Virtualization Minimal", "Minimal Hypervisor", "Virtualization Node"
> > ?

+1 to the proposal above.

> You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group there, which
> is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization
> host. Admittedly this does include some desktop tools too.
> 
> If introducing a new group for the host, then I'd say we might want
> to also change the existing group to be solely the client mgmt tools
> "Virtualization Client" ? [...]

Old group renamed to "Virtualization Desktop Tools" maybe?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux