On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group there, which > is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization > host. Admittedly this does include some desktop tools too. Right, I forgot to mention why existing "Virtualization" is not good enough for this use-cases and it's exactly because it includes GUI stuff which is not needed on the minimal hypervisor install. > If introducing a new group for the host, then I'd say we might want > to also change the existing group to be solely the client mgmt tools > "Virtualization Client" ? It gets even more fuzzy when you wonder > where the new 'GNOME Boxes' app will live - probably under 'GNOME' > desktop I presume ? Renaming current "Virtualization" to "Virtualization Client" makes sense. I would put new Boxes into both Virt.Client and GNOME groups, list of packages are not exclusive. Alan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
