On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:42:57AM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:27:10PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 08:16:31AM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > > > The libreoffice team uses this resolution for > > > > > > 1) bugs that are not reproducible, but we _think_ we know what is the > > > cause (these are mostly "fire and forget" abrt bugs, where we managed to > > > get something useful from the backtrace) > > > > CLOSED -> WORKSFORME or INSUFFICIENT_DATA > > > > > 2) bugs that only appear under very specific conditions and are unlikely > > > to affect many users. > > > > CLOSED -> CANTFIX or WONTFIX > > > > I don't think CLOSED -> UPSTREAM is a good resolution for either of > > these classes of unfixed bugs. > > It seems I was not clear enough--I spoke about bugs we _fixed_ in > upstream, but did not backport the fixes into Fedora. But, well, I do > not really care so much--I will roll a die the next time I am not sure > which resolution to pick... Ah well if you have *fixed* the bugs, then CLOSED -> UPSTREAM is perfectly reasonable. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
