Re: Proposal for update to packaging guidelines for icon files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Would it make sense just to put the hicolor directory into filesystem?
> > It seems silly to have every single graphical app in the distro depend
> > on a package simply for the provision of the directory...
> 
> There are also all the subdirectories such as
> /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/.
> 
> And the whole purpose of hicolor-icon-theme is to include those directories
> and the index.theme file.

I count two files and 339 directories (plus one directory and three file under 
/usr/share/doc/).

If that's not enough to justify a separate package, but it's undesirable to 
include these files even on a minimal server, then perhaps they could be added 
to some X package that all graphical programs depend on anyway? Just a 
thought.

Björn Persson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux