On 01/20/2012 02:04 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
----- Original Message -----
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:30 +0000, Tim Waugh wrote:
We already had this discussion, I don't recall exactly - two years ago
and the resolution was similar - rename CLOSED UPSTREAM to HOLD UPSTREAM.
I can try to find it :) As it's usually used this way - bug is reported
to upstream (by reporter, us in case he does not have account or is not
willing to do it), then the bug can bounce between Fedora/upstream (you
know, everyone has to blame other side or sometimes it's not easy to
say who to blame ;-). And the bug is actually not fixed in Fedora until
we receive fix - then it can go to some CLOSED RAWHIDE/NEXTRELEASE state.
The biggest problem here is just - some people misuse this CLOSED UPSTREAM
as we don't care in Fedora. And they would use another CLOSED resolution
to close the bug :)
... and why no simply keep these BZs "open" and/or to add a note
"Reported upstream" and keep abrt open to receive more of them
(This would at least provide an indicator for the severity of a bug)?
This would at least reflect the actual situation in Fedora:
Bug is still present.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
