Re: Requesting a change to the BugStatusWorkFlow: Closed/UPSTREAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:17 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 20.1.2012 00:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Currently, the official bug lifecycle includes the following phrase:
> > "The resolution UPSTREAM can be used by maintainers to denote a bug that
> > they expect to be fixed by upstream development and naturally rolled
> > back into Fedora as part of the update process. Ideally, a comment
> > should be added with a link to the upstream bug report."
> >
> > I've seen quite a few bugs lately closed with this resolution (mostly in
> > the Evolution and GNOME projects for me personally). It seems to me that
> > this is terribly useless in terms of informing users when their bugs are
> > fixed.
> 
> You are completely right, except:
> 
>   * since I wrote 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/79936/ nobody 
> did anything on numerous Bugzilla bugs like 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123130, 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380493 ... if you know 
> about any Perl hacker who would be willing to help, these bugs could be 
> a good place to start,

That's a fantastic idea, and probably an ideal solution. Unfortunately,
we're also talking about a minimum of several months' work to get that
in place, just on the engineering side. Not including the deployment
testing period.

>   * BugZappers more or less failed to do any meaningful change in the 
> state of our Bugzilla (that's to the large part my failure, but that's 
> how it is) and there is just too few of them,

I'm not sure about what you meant here.

>   * this really sounds like proverbial "somebody else should do 
> something" ...

Well, the proposal I'm making is the one that I've been following
personally in my own projects, which I feel is providing better service
to my users. I agree that if we had the solution you propose above
available, that would meet (or exceed) the same need.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux