Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:48:35 +0100,
>  Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 01/14/2012 07:12 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> I agree! If a package is orphaned, can't we automatically escalate
>> ownership to the next co-maintainer (when there is one - perhaps the
>> one with the most commits for example).
>>
>> If a package is being orphaned for legitimate reasons, the owner
>> should announce the intention to their co-maintainers first and they
>> can opt to remove their ACLs before the package is orphaned.
>
> Currently to change ownership you need to orphan the package first so that
> the co-maintainer can take ownership. There isn't a one step way to
> give away a package.

He was talking about how the process should be improved not about the
current state ...
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux