Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Thats your preference. Some people would be better off with another
> supported package that does something similar, or even a package from
> an upstream thats more up to date or functional.

That assumes such a package exists. I have no problems with packages getting 
retired when there's really a better replacement which covers the use cases 
of the original package (and ideally is officially designated as a 
successor), in which case there should also be Obsoletes in place. But in 
many cases, there is just no alternative at all to the dropped package, or 
at least none that's actually packaged in Fedora.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux