Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/1/14 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On 01/14/2012 12:10 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
>>
>> Then you can't blindly work the averages and apply hard limits. Just
>> because some packages are high maintenance, doesn't mean that can't
>> cope with dozens of low maintenance packages.
>>
>
> That hard limit is based on an guestimated time it takes to fix a single bug
> from a guestimated free time an individual has to do so.
>
> As you mentioned that it took you around 30 minutes to fix one bug on
> average and I know for a fact that it takes me on average around 30 minutes
> to migrate legacy sysv init which is where that number initially comes from
> since the steps are similar in that regard as in.
>
[snip]
>
> Now 60(minutes)×4(guestimated available free hours)÷30( guestimated time it
> takes to fix) = 8 which means you as an individual can cover fixing bugs for
> 8 components per day which is the *worst case* scenario as in each day all
> of the 8 components receive one bug report but in more general terms I think
> it's safe to assume you can afford spending half an hour on average per day
> per individual component if you maintain 8 components in general maintenance
> tasks for those components.

I'm not disagreeing with 30 minutes per bug - just your guesstimate of
one bug per package per day. Low maintenance packages are more like
one bug per package per year.

-- 
Iain.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux