Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Schwendt writes:

What doesn't work is that we're supposed to "sponsor" people, who dump
packages into the collection without really trying to take care of them
afterwards. With no other users of those packages joining the team that
tries to maintain the packages. With bug reports being ignored. With the
initial packagers abandoning the Fedora Project without prior warning.

I wonder how many of them abandoned ship because they suddenly found themselves dealing with – in their view – an unproductive, and hard-to-use desktop, in F-16.

Or the fact that upgrading from one Fedora to release is no longer as smooth as it used to be, given – more or less – the de-emphasis of the upgrade path, with new installs being the preferred way.

But, in any case, Fedora's gotten too big, in my view. Going on a weight- loss diet may not be such a bad thing.

Attachment: pgpJei8BrqQqx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux