Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:38:56PM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 01/10/2012 07:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset,
> >packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned.
> >comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages.
> >
> >The list of orphaned packages is here:
> >https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt
> 
> I'm a little confused, I thought I picked up xournal. I see it on
> that list as to be orphaned. I've been issuing updates as needed so
> will that ownership automatically pass to me? I checked packagedb and
> I see there are other co-maintainers with commit rights. Its funny
> since I think I've been managing the package as if I were the sole
> maintainer.
> 
> Do I just sit and wait then?
> 
No, please just pick it up.  The pkgdb does not automatically select
a comaintainer to promote to maintainer at this time as there were some user
interface warts that people felt were too onerous.  We want it to come back
someday but haven;t had time to do a lot of work on it.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpHtDQJAxzQ6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux