W dniu 28.11.2011 17:52, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 28.11.2011 17:32, Bill Nottingham pisze: >> Julian Sikorski (belegdol@xxxxxxxxx) said: >>> Dear Fedorians, >>> >>> goffice-0.9.0 was released recently, along with new gnumeric [1,2]. What >>> is your opinion on pushing the update to rawhide ASAP? To the best of my >>> knowledge stable goffice 0.10 and gnumeric 1.12 should be out by the >>> time Fedora 17 ships, so putting this into rawhide now would allow for >>> plenty of time to iron out any potential problems. Missing the alpha >>> change deadline [3] most likely means we need to wait until Fedora 18. >> >> Is it relatively API stable? >> >> Bill > I asked Jean Brefort, one of goffice developers: > > <belegdol> hi jean, I got asked if goffice is relatively api-stable > <jean> not yet > <jean> but I'd say mostly > <belegdol> may i quote you on that? > <jean> we intend to add placehoders for more members on exported classes > <jean> of course, you can quote me > > Regards, > Julian I am going to go ahead and commit this. In case packages cannot be fixed in time, we can always introduce compat-goffice. Julian -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
