Re: using a macro in ExclusiveArch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-01-05, Björn Persson <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The simplest solution seems to be to let SIG members co-maintain
> redhat-rpm-config. Did you have some more elaborate solution in mind?
>
My idea is to let SIGs to maintain their specific standalone packages
injecting files into /etc/rpm and to ask redhat-rpm-config owner to
require the SIG-maintaned packages.

This would allow SIGs to tune build-root macros without disturbing
redhat-rpm-config. On the other hand it would weaken surveillance over
the changes.

There is also processing advantage---each SIG has different policy who
is core SIG developer (usually co-maintainers of the main
intrepreter/compiler). My solution does not hassle redhat-rpm-config
with these problems.

-- Petr

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux