Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jim,

2012/1/3 <devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Is there some sort of reminder service that could be configured to nag the maintainers of a package in a situation like this? Personally, I would appreciate it, and I think Fedora would benefit if we could do something to minimize reverse-version skew between Fedora-latest and rawhide.

Hmmm. Would something like that: http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/247409-autotest/qa01.qa.fedoraproject.org/upgradepath/results/iwhd-1.2-1.fc16.html* do the job for you? The associated explanations are quite clear: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_tests/Upgradepath
To play devil's advocate, the first time I received such an email from the AutoQA bot, I did not fully understand what it meant...

Regards

Denis

*: simply found by looking within the package update page (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16933/iwhd-1.2-1.fc16), and for which you should have received a mail with a few explanations
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux