On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 21:40 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote: > Very few are using GNUtls, so even if there are gaping holes, they > wouldn't be worth the effort of either the whitehat or blackhat > communities to dig out and expose/abuse. hms hms... nice logic... > On the other hand OpenSSL exists in millions or dozens of millions of > systems, so at least is has been exposed to some significant security > review. I don't get your problem. I'm a fairly strong user of OpenSSL, but GNUtls has importance: * better licensing * alternative implementation * brings competition I think it's about time more people started using it too. By your logic, GNU/Linux would never have grown as it has been growing. It's more important to make GNUtls ready than discussing strawmen... Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
