Re: nss_db

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/16/2011 03:40 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Mark R Bannister (mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
that affect critical components such as glibc.  Now you're telling me that when
you collectively make decisions about what goes into Fedora, you have no regard
for what the knock-on effect is for downstream, not even how that might impact RHEL.
He's saying *he* doesn't. If you think he speaks for everyone who works
on Fedora, well...

Yes I am but one voice in the community distribution Fedora and I don't serve on any committee or anything like that nor was I ever implying that I did or that I was speaking or otherwise represent the whole project or certain subgroups within the project in any shape or form.

The board can clear all up all misunderstanding that the RHEL users/customer or any other downstream or any clone distribution users to the Fedoraproject might have.

An simple wiki page with the nature of the relationship between the Fedoraproject and Red Hat and any other downstream or clone distribution and the responsibility we have with regards to those distributions as in non Fedora users probably would suffice to prevent any kind of misunderstanding in the future.

I'll open a ticket and or get the discussion of that going on over on the board list.

Regards
              JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux