Hi, On 12/06/2011 06:17 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
After yesterday's rebuilds, there remain 271 binary packages from 232 source packages that still require libpng-compat. No FTBFS bugs have been filed at this time. There's a pretty wide variety of failures represented here. In addition to the libpng API changes, a quick scan also unconvers glib deprecation failures, unsatisfiable buildroots, gcc getting yet more strict about C++, and even a few implicit-dso-linking errors. Since libpng uses symbol versions, and rpm is smart enough to embed symbol versions into DSO provides and requires, there's another bit of data we can extract here. If a (i686) package requires libpng12.so.0 but not libpng12.so.0(PNG12_0), then it is _linked against_ libpng12 but does not use any symbols from it. The link can usually be dropped; and any build failure exposed by this rebuild stands a good chance of not being libpng's fault. There are 102 such binary packages, from 99 source packages.
Thanks for your work on this. I've fixed, and rebuild against libpng-1.5, the following packages: zvbi widelands SILLY openmsx nogravity libglpng lbrickbuster2 gcompris camorama CriticalMass ClanLib06 ClanLib1 ClanLib methane openalchemist bolzplatz2006, BlockOutII Which should take care of all my packages on the list. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
