On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:06 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:52 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:34:12 +0100 > > Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 15:21 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher > > > > > <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > * #715 Provenpackager education/status/brainstorming (sgallagh, > > > > > > 18:43:02) > > > > > > > > > > There was some discussion a while back about preventing certain > > > > > extensions from being uploaded to the lookaside cache. Could > > > > > ".patch" be added to that list? > > > > > > > > Of course, a whitelist might be a better idea. Maybe we only > > > > allow .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 and .zip to be uploaded this way and make > > > > additional exceptions as they arise. > > > > > > What about running a 'file' command on the stuff and if the output > > > contains 'text' then allow upload only with some kind of --force > > > option? > > > > And what about separately shipped license files, documentation and so > > on? > > > > Not a valid option. > > What's wrong with using --force option for such files? These are not > that common so that should not be much hassle. Also if they are small I > do not see any reason why not to put them directly into the git > repository. > > Or maybe the condition for need of the force flag could be modified to > not require it for files larger than some size (for example 100kBytes) > even if 'file' outputs that they are a text files. I created RFE bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767264 with proof of concept patch. -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
