On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, TASAKA Mamoru <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00: >> Hi, >> >> Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started >> maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2]. >> > > AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new review request. > > e.g. > fork; util-linux -> util-linux-ng > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252046 > > rename: again util-linux-ng -> util-linux > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667416 But what when the name doesn't change? As Jussi described it, it's the same "project" just a different upstream and nothing rewritten from scratch. So it should be ok... Greetings, Tom -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
