Hi, > I'm an upstream OpenNebula developer, and it's nice to hear that > you've been packaging Ruby gems required by the OpenNebula package. > Currently I've been working with Shawn Starr (CC) on the OpenNebula > package, and for the moment the issue has been mostly with Ruby gems > dependencies, so they're sure to come in handy. Yes, indeed. I went through this in autumn. We have ONE3.0 up and running on an SL(C)6 box. For that I had to package some gems which were at the time not provided upstream yet. I compiled a list of the gems which I have on this server, which I put here: http://uschwick.home.cern.ch/uschwick/ONE/gems.txt I do not know how useful this list is. > This is the feature page in Fedoraproject.org's site: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OpenNebula ok > We will update it this weekend as we will have an open packaging > meeting at #opennebula in Freenode (which of course you're more than > welcome to join if you please) to reflect the status of all the Ruby > gems dependencies. Who else is working on this ? The gems I have may require a bit of work to make them compliant with the packaging policies. Also, at least for one, I could not use the latest upstream version, and it was indeed not actually required. > It would be great if you could complete the wiki page with any > information you consider relevant. I cannot promise that I will have time to join the meeting during the week end. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
