On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 09:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> * Fri Jun 13 2008 Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.2.12-8 > >> - Install icons in /usr/share/pixmaps, not /usr/share/icons as this > >> package has historically done; the former is considered correct. > >> > >> Digging further, the reason I changed it is because Red Hat's rpmdiff > >> tool whinged about the previous placement. Somebody is not on the right > >> page here. > > > If you dumped the icons directly into the toplevel of /usr/share/icons, > > that's most definitely NOT compliant with the icon theme spec, and that'll > > explain why the tool complained about it. > > Doh. The rpmdiff warning is a bit badly phrased and underdocumented, > then :-( The short version of what you should do is, at a minimum, put a 48x48 version of the icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48 . It's really good to put a .svg version of the icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable too, and what with GNOME using very large icons on its overview now, it's really desirable to provide a 128x128, 192x192 or even 256x256 version too. Of course, it all depends what sizes and formats are available from upstream. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
